Readers React

Each week, the Observer-Reporter asks Facebook friends to respond to a question about an issue in the news. This week, we asked: “What do you think about the New York Times’ decision to publish an anonymous op-ed about an internal “resistance” to President Trump?”

Jerry Hickman: First of all is the source, “anonymous senior official.”

Lest we forget that NYT was caught in 2011 calling an anonymous source (who turned out to be an intern) a “senior official.”

Plus the timing to the Woodward book release.

Whole story should be taken with a grain of salt right now.

Eric McGrosky: ... and Deep Throat was an assistant FBI director ...

Butch Tuttle: Maybe, just maybe, it’s someone from The NY Times just to create a problem for the administration.

Gloria Angotti Fryer: Freedom of the press is a constitutional right; Eric McGrosky said it well; the U.S. DOJ cannot investigate, no jurisdiction. It is unfortunate that DJT does not understand (1) the Constitution; (2) the balance of power between the three branches of government.

Steve Sisul: Hey. It’s the New York Times. What do you expect out of that paper?

Eric McGrosky: ... yeah, all those Pulitzers were a just a sham ... yeah, right ...

Stephen Smith: Garbage. Had been for a long time. And a Pulitzer is like a Grammy ... garbage

Codey Amprim: Yeah, a bunch of elites giving themselves awards.

Chris Daman: I know someone who thinks it is true. His tweets want to know who it is.

Nicolas Borovich: I think that they should release the name of the anonymous author.

Submit your question for our weekly Reader React Poll Question here.

See what people are talking about at The Community Table!

Thank you for reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.